Prompts

type Prompt = {
  category: "Discovery";
  vars: ["COMPANY", "INDUSTRY", "PASTE", "ROLE OF ATTENDEES"];
}

I have a discovery call with [COMPANY], a [INDUSTRY] company, with [ROLE OF ATTENDEES]. Our product does [ONE-LINE PRODUCT]. Using only public info I paste below, list: 5 likely business pains, 10 open-ended discovery questions ranked by importance, and 3 signals that this is NOT a fit. Info: [PASTE]

type Prompt = {
  category: "Discovery";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

Here are raw notes from a discovery call: [PASTE]. Rewrite them as: current state, desired outcome, metrics they care about, decision process, technical environment, risks, and open questions. Flag anything I assumed but they did not say.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Discovery";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

From this email thread and call notes [PASTE], build a stakeholder map: name, title, what they care about, likely objection, influence (high/med/low). Suggest one question to ask each person next.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Demo prep";
  vars: ["LIST"];
}

Our product features: [LIST]. Prospect pains from discovery: [LIST]. Build a 20-minute demo flow: opening hook tied to their top pain, 3 scenes (pain → feature → outcome), and a close asking for a specific next step. Cut any feature that doesn't map to a pain.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Demo prep";
  vars: ["COLUMNS", "INDUSTRY", "USE CASE"];
}

Generate 25 rows of realistic but fake sample data for a [INDUSTRY] demo of [USE CASE] as CSV with columns [COLUMNS]. Include 3 edge cases that would make the demo more convincing. No real company or person names.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Demo prep";
  vars: ["BUYER ROLE", "PASTE"];
}

Here is my demo outline: [PASTE]. Act as a skeptical [BUYER ROLE]. List the 7 moments where you would lose interest or push back, and how I should fix each.

type Prompt = {
  category: "POC scoping";
  vars: ["COMPANY", "PRODUCT", "USE CASE"];
}

Draft a POC scope for [COMPANY] testing [PRODUCT] for [USE CASE]. Include: objective, 3–5 measurable success criteria, in/out of scope, data and access needed from them, timeline by week, owners on both sides, and exit decision. Keep it to one page.

type Prompt = {
  category: "POC scoping";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

Here are proposed POC success criteria: [PASTE]. For each, say if it is measurable, who measures it, how it could be gamed or misread, and rewrite vague ones into concrete pass/fail tests.

type Prompt = {
  category: "POC scoping";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

The customer sent this security/IT questionnaire: [PASTE]. Using our documentation [PASTE], draft answers. Mark any question where our docs don't clearly support an answer as NEEDS REVIEW instead of guessing.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Technical writeups";
  vars: ["PASTE DIAGRAM DESCRIPTION OR NOTES"];
}

Explain this integration architecture [PASTE DIAGRAM DESCRIPTION OR NOTES] to a non-technical VP in under 200 words: what connects to what, where their data goes, and what their team has to do. No jargon without a plain-English gloss.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Technical writeups";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

Turn these notes into a solution design doc with sections: context, requirements, proposed design, integrations, data flow, security considerations, alternatives considered, open questions. Notes: [PASTE]

type Prompt = {
  category: "Technical writeups";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

Here is an error log from a customer environment: [PASTE]. Summarize what likely failed, the 3 most probable root causes in order, and the exact next diagnostic step for each. Say clearly if the log is insufficient.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Objection handling";
  vars: ["DEAL CONTEXT", "OBJECTION"];
}

Prospect objection: "[OBJECTION]". Context: [DEAL CONTEXT]. Give 3 responses: one that asks a clarifying question, one that reframes with a business outcome, one that offers proof (POC, reference, doc). Keep each under 60 words.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Objection handling";
  vars: ["COMPETITOR", "PASTE", "USE CASE"];
}

We're competing with [COMPETITOR] for [USE CASE]. From the public info I paste [PASTE], list where they are genuinely stronger, where we are, and 4 discovery questions that surface our strengths honestly. Don't invent claims about them.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Objection handling";
  vars: [];
}

The customer's engineering team says they can build this in-house. Draft a respectful talk track covering total cost of ownership, time to value, maintenance, and what they'd still own. Include 3 questions to quantify their build estimate.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Implementation plans";
  vars: ["CUSTOMER", "PRODUCT", "TEAM SIZE", "USE CASE"];
}

Create a 30-60-90 day implementation plan for [CUSTOMER] deploying [PRODUCT] for [USE CASE] with [TEAM SIZE]. Include milestones, dependencies, customer-side owners, risks, and what 'live' means at day 90.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Implementation plans";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

From this project plan [PASTE], build a risk register table: risk, likelihood, impact, early warning sign, mitigation, owner. Add 3 risks the plan doesn't mention but deployments like this commonly hit.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Implementation plans";
  vars: ["PASTE", "SYSTEM"];
}

Here's a messy Slack thread about how we set up [SYSTEM] for a customer: [PASTE]. Turn it into a numbered runbook with prerequisites, steps, verification checks, and rollback steps.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Stakeholder updates";
  vars: ["CUSTOMER", "PASTE"];
}

Write a weekly status email for [CUSTOMER] from these notes [PASTE]: green/yellow/red status, done this week, next week, blockers needing their action (with owner and date), decisions needed. Under 200 words.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Stakeholder updates";
  vars: ["CUSTOMER EXEC", "ISSUE"];
}

Draft a calm escalation email to [CUSTOMER EXEC] about [ISSUE]: what happened, impact, what we've done, what we need from them, and the date of the next update. No blame, no hedging.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Stakeholder updates";
  vars: ["PASTE"];
}

Summarize this deal for my internal team from these notes [PASTE]: why we won/lost, what the customer actually valued, product gaps raised, and 3 lessons for the next similar deal.

type Prompt = {
  category: "Stakeholder updates";
  vars: ["CUSTOMER", "N", "PASTE"];
}

Draft an EBR outline for [CUSTOMER] after [N] months using these usage metrics and outcomes [PASTE]: goals vs results, value delivered, adoption gaps, roadmap asks, and a proposed expansion next step. Only use the numbers provided.